There are a lot of misconceptions about the Right of Responsible Access, or the “Right to Roam”. A friend of mine in Saskatchewan recently said her farm was broken into a number of times despite the fact they installed cameras. “I don’t think Right to Roam is a good idea,” she wrote me. That’s terrible. But the fact is, “Right to Roam” doesn’t allow people to break into buildings. Unfortunately, putting up more NO TRESPASSING signs won’t stop crooks, either… they already know what they’re doing is illegal. Whether the government of SK adopts responsible access, or (as seems more likely) accepts the association of rural municipalities’ request for tighter trespassing laws, either way, nothing changes when it comes to farmer’s yards and buildings. Breaking in is illegal already. In countries like Scotland, if anything, the laws got tighter when the Right of Access came in. The two problems in Saskatchewan, and elsewhere, are a “they can go to hell” culture, and a lack of enforcement of EXISTING laws.
THE EVIDENCE The idea is to reduce property damage and theft and to live in healthy communities. Everyone agrees. So what’s the evidence? Evidence-based arguments show that, in Finland, Norway, Scotland, Sweden, and Iceland, countries that are quite similar to Canada with northern climates, and small populations spread over big areas – in those countries increasing access, rather than decreasing it, is what decreases rural crime, vandalism and littering. Increasing access actually puts more sympathetic eyes on the land, rather than fewer. It increases public interest and public attention. Criminals don’t work out in the open. They dump their garbage, or deface a wall, or break through a lock, when no one is looking.
CHINOOK PARKWAY I grew up in Swift Current SK. There’s a trail along the Swift Current Creek called the Chinook Parkway. It wasn’t there when I was a kid. I spent a lot of time along that creek looking for garter snakes and later, golf balls. But the area was always dirty and dangerous. There were too many broken beer bottles in the long grass – no one cared. If Swift Current had put up a fence along the creek and increased fines tenfold it wouldn’t have stopped kids from breaking bottles and starting campfires and leaving garbage. Police can’t be everywhere. But creating a public access space in the Chinook Parkway where people walk and jog and cycle has put more people out in the open. It’s made the river’s edge – and the city – healthier, and better, and safer.
GRADUAL CULTURAL CHANGE You don’t make a rule and expect it to change everything, you try to change the culture gradually. What option will create greater, and healthier community for Canadian people? Does the higher the fence mean the better the neighbour, really? In Norway and Sweden and Scotland and Finland and Austria and some other countries, there’s a whole culture where people are trained up, from childhood, to know how to be on the land – how to respect crops, and animals, and fences, and private buildings. They know how to pick berries or mushrooms and respect property at the same time. Sure, it doesn’t happen overnight. But the question to ask ourselves is: what will be the direction that bringing in a new piece of legislation will take us?
LIABILITY: Some landowners will say: well, we could never have the Right of Responsible Access in Canada because some city person would come out here and fall down a badger hole and before you know it I’d be sued. FALSE. In Scotland and in other countries where they’ve brought in such laws, at the same time they passed laws protecting landowners from lawsuits. It wasn’t difficult. In those countries, it’s nearly impossible for someone to sue a landowner for personal injury while exercising responsible access. The only exception would be if the landowner willingly and intentionally set some kind of trap for walkers. Shy of that, they’re protected. For more on this, and on the evidence for crime rates, see “This Land is Our Land” (a terrible title, but a good book), by Ken Ilgunas.
THE QUESTION: So the question is: what kind of future makes for better community? Do you want to live in a land where there’s more fear, more danger, where if you break down on the road you’re afraid to go and ask for help? Or do you want you and your children to grow up in a land where landowners are respected and yet at the same time, everyone feels a connection to, and a responsibility for, the land? Where people can stop by the side of the road and pick chokecherries or saskatoons or raspberries, or have a picnic (making sure to pick up their garbage). Where city dwellers understand some of the problems of farmers and ranchers, because they actually know something about the land and have met the people? The more people feel a connection to the land, the way farmers and ranchers do, the more everyone – even urban people – act as allies. Fences don’t make people safe. Good relations do.
somethinggrand 
8 replies on “Fences Don’t Make Good Neighbours”
Excellent and important post! Bravo!
Thank you Peregrina!
“Fences don’t make people safe. Good relations do.” That is so cool
thanks stbarbebaker! And getting people interested and involved (and outside) in their local environment, as you’re doing!
Hello
Thanks 🙏 – thought provoking. Having grown up on the shores of Lake Ontario, with unlimited access equally shared with the public but maintained by our family, (naturally and financially), “Fences don’t make people safe. Good relations do.” resonates even today.
Only when threatened by newcomers from the city did my elderly parents feel that their respect of nature and their abiding care was in jeopardy. A short term temporary “fence” and local media article enlightened the public and changed the quiet enjoyment so long enjoyed and maintained for over 100 years as a family. Sometimes good fences change thoughts to accommodate better respect and behaviour. Today a lovely boardwalk is in place for others to enjoy yet sadly the local killdeer, indigenous plant species and wild grasses have found new homes. Nature at mans “expanse” can at times feel unwanted. The original homestead remains in our family and as century old good neighbours, respect for all continues. Roots matter and peaceful sharing continues ….
Thanks for taking the time to read the post and for your comments. As your words – and your experiences – point out, there is often a burden placed on those who unofficially maintain and preserve spaces when outsiders with little knowledge of the place and sometimes little attention or care to it, arrive. There is a place for fences occasionally – if only to guide traffic patterns sometimes as well! It sounds like you are keeping up the care of that portion of the world. Thank you.
Thank you for recognizing in your words, the burden of respecting nature and the natural beach lands. The care of the beachfront was never a burden but rather a respect of nature. When my grandfather came to Canada from Scotland I can only imagine that building a family through love and Faith were top of mind. Sadly, I never met my grandfather but I believe his courage to settle in Canada and put down roots far from home was incredible. As mentioned, burden versus respect can take a toll when others show lack of love & care for what was once freely shared.
Canada can and should look at other models of respect and care. It is a joy to walk a beach or feel the wind in your hair and know that nature is far greater than fences or laws created by man.
Many people now enjoy the boardwalk e-bikes, traditional cyclists , scooters and walkers. However renaming the ‘boardwalk ‘ a ‘boardrun’ or ´boardroad’ today would be more appropriate based on the type of traffic! As noted in your reply, the fence was a reminder and yet enforcing the laws to protect quiet enjoyment or the simple pleasures seem now forgotten and written promises made to ‘maintain’ the walkway as a walking path seem the burden of the municipality. To reduce taxes and the harassment by the uninformed not long after my father’s death, part of our heritage was sold to the municipality in good Faith and Hope that quiet enjoyment for others and our family would be enjoyed. Governments will come and go – rules will rise and fall and Nature will adapt for the sake of Man. Let’s hope that on earth Faith, Friendship, Love and Respect continue to be the bridges to peaceful existence. Fences are forces built by Man not by Mother Nature whose existence is a gentle but constant force to be admired.
Thank you for taking time to write bac and for creating this forum to share. It is time to admire the lake and walk the dogs on the natural beach.
my pleasure! Enjoy the walk on the beach with your dogs, and thanks for reading!